The court in Monroe upheld the finding that there was no reasonable expectation of privacy in the files on the email host, which resided on a government server, at least from the system administrator. The Air Force court had compared the email host to an unsecured file cabinet in a superior\'s work area. Note the different treatment of a government server and government-provided personal computer. The former generally carries with it no reasonable expectation of privacy, while the latter must be assessed on a case-by-case basis using an O\'Conner v. Ortega type analysis. Any potential expectation of privacy would have additionally been negated by the consent banners. Additionally, the system administrator\'s reading of the contents of the stuck emails while troubleshooting a problem was proper under the "system provider exception" to the Electronic Communication Privacy Act. This Act will be addressed more thoroughly later.
<img src="../../images/cy205090.gif" width="780" height="456" border="0">
Glossary
Resources
Show Text
Site Map
Help
Exit
Back
12 of 18
Next